Context makes AI know your rules. Foixar makes AI answerable to them — from the scenario your team composes to the PR that merges.
Signed-in shopper at checkout
Payment method panel open
Chooses transfer over card
Confirmation within 2 minutes
What does the customer see?
needs guardrailTranscripts, documents, or a scenario canvas become grounded specs, ADO work items, and generated code — with an architect's sign-off and a sealed receipt at every gate. Standards without enforcement are just suggestions.
Regulated delivery is our home turf. Foixar enforces the rules your regulators, auditors, and architects already wrote — at the pull request, at the exact line.
Raw SQL near money movement is an audit finding, not a style nit. Change control is the product.
fin-no-raw-sql · blocked @ L218Rating logic is regulated IP. Nothing touches it without a decision on record and a receipt behind it.
rating-engine-sealed · write refusedPHI in a client-side cache is a breach, not a bug. The boundary has to hold at generation time.
phi-no-client-cache · blocked @ L88The OT boundary is not a suggestion. Plant systems are read-only to anything an AI ever drafted.
ot-historian-readonly · write refusedData residency is law, not configuration. Every export path answers to policy before it exists.
residency-us-only · export blockedOne tenant's data in another tenant's response ends the contract. Isolation is enforced at the PR.
tenant-isolation · cross-tenant @ L67Vibe coding dies here. Every violation is caught at the line — with the rule that fired, the decision that explains it, and a sealed receipt for the auditor who asks in March.
Azure DevOps or GitHub — one click and stories become real work items and a feature branch. Generated code comes back as a pull request with governance checks attached — natively.
4 rules · slice boundary respected · plan aligned
requiredtenant filter ✓ · secrets in Key Vault ✓ · no raw SQL — fixed @ L214
required3 tests cited for changed behavior
required28 rules evaluated · all blockers resolved
requiredcontext receipt Δ f04b7a verified against sealed boundary
required3 tests cited for changed behavior
requiredFoixar is the governance layer, not a walled garden. Models change every quarter — your standards shouldn't have to.
Claude, GPT, Azure OpenAI, Gemini — or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Swap providers without touching a single rule.
Provider credentials live in your Azure Key Vault — referenced, never copied. Rotate them; Foixar never sees a change.
Specs, evidence, and receipts persist to your Blob storage and your ADO repos. Leave tomorrow and every artifact stays with you.
Governance is the constant. The model is your choice.
Foixar is model-agnostic by design. Point it at your Azure OpenAI deployment, your Anthropic key, or your self-hosted endpoint — swap the intelligence any time. The governance never changes.
The model is a config value. The governance is the product. Sealed boundaries, grounded specs, PR verdicts, and receipts apply identically — whichever model your team runs today or adopts tomorrow.
Three seats at the table. One shared source of truth.
You wrote the ADRs. You drew the slice boundaries. Foixar makes them binding — on every spec, every generation, every PR — while you sleep, take PTO, or sit in a steering meeting.
You've watched clean requirements come back mangled — or stalled in refinement for two sprints. Foixar grounds your spec in the actual codebase before a single ticket is written, so what you promise is what ships.
Copilots are fast and confidently wrong about your codebase. Foixar hands your tools the context they're missing — the slice, the patterns, the decisions — so generated code lands inside the lines the first time.
Foixar sits in Teams and Slack, answering from your decisions, your documents, and your delivery history — in plain language anyone in the room can act on. And every generation ships with a sealed receipt: who approved the context, which rules ran, what they found. When compliance asks how AI-generated code is governed, you don't write a memo. You show the receipt.
@Foixar we want to add a "pay by bank transfer" option to the client portal. How big a change is that?
Medium-sized — about one sprint. It touches three areas you already have: checkout, payment confirmation emails, and finance reporting. Your team decided in March that all new payment types go through your existing payments partner, so no new banking integrations are needed. You shipped something very similar last quarter — card payments — in one sprint.
Loading the latest Foixar research…
A 30-minute demo on your stack — Angular, .NET, Azure DevOps.